Wednesday, June 02, 2010

Review of Robin Hood

With a name such as mine, I have always emulated Robin Hood as a kind of patron saint. It was therefore with great anticipation that I went to see the new Robin Hood movie.

I was not impressed. The film offers neither good character development nor the type of sustained suspense of an action thriller. Completely bereft of all poetry and romance (not to mention the absence of any sword fighting or a good quarter staff brawl), the movie had little continuity with the Robin Hood of myth.

But there was one thing the movie gets right: Robin Hood was no socialist.

We know very little about the historical Robin Hood. But we do know that he was not a proto-Obama figure, redistributing wealth to achieve a utopia of economic quality.

But didn’t Robin Hood steal from the rich to give to the poor? If the legends are to be believed, he merely attempted to give back to the people what the government and the corrupt clergy had taken from them. Ridley Scott gets this exactly right in portraying Robin Hood as the defender of a people being taxed to death by a corrupt government.

1 comment:

vikingmom said...

thanks for the concise review.

Good to great actor (Russell Crowe) , but substandard script.

So it means I might DVR it when it shows up on TV and NOT buy the dvd.

Nice to know that the actual (and movie) Robin Hood was not portrayed as a current 21st century socialist "in tights".

Buy Essential Oils at Discounted Prices!