
My own personal view is that if one assumes that marriage means a union of two persons, then a strong case can be made that both Proposition 8 and DOMA violate the 14th Amendment in the same way that a law prohibiting interracial marriage would violate it. The problem is that the only way one can assert that marriage is a union of persons is to assume in advance a certain verdict of the lawsuit, for as things presently stand in federal law marriage is not a union of persons but a union of a man and a woman. Arguing for a verdict with categories that already presuppose that outcome is called circular reasoning. There are signs that some of the Supreme Court Justices are being persuaded by this fallacious circular reasoning.
____________
Read my columns at the Charles Colson Center
Read my writings at Alfred the Great Society
To join my mailing list, send a blank email to robin (at sign) atgsociety.com with “Blog Me” in the subject heading.
Click Here to friend-request me on Facebook and get news feeds every time new articles are added to this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment